Showing posts with label Wrecsam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wrecsam. Show all posts

Wednesday, 28 October 2009

Praise for pioneering anti-social behaviour team



North Wales Assembly Member Janet Ryder has praised the work of a pioneering team tackling anti-social behaviour hotspots.

The Plaid Cymru AM for North Wales made her comments after visiting the Youth Justice team at its base in Derby Road, Brynteg, near Wrexham.

 The team of four in the picture  - Fred Derbyshire, Nick Edwards, Donna Shepherd and team leader Craig Matthews - work from an office above the local AM/PM store run by Dino Paletta, also pictured, who has been backing the scheme by providing free office space.

She said: "This team is targetting areas that have the potential to spiral into anti-social behaviour and I'm very much in favour of this kind of preventative work. If we can nip problems in the bud by providing alternative outlets for youngsters as well as getting them to inter-act more with older generations then the savings in terms of community relations and the actual cost of police intervention is huge."

The team is currently engaged in a 12-week project in the Brynteg area, where a public meeting agreed on a course of action for the team, who work closely with the police, local council and other agencies.

Janet Ryder added: "Twelve weeks seems a very short timescale to make an effective intervention and, although I'm sure it is making a real difference in key communities, perhaps the programme needs to have more time to make an impact in villages like Brynteg. I would welcome greater involvement by the team on a longer-term basis to engage with children from the age of eight upwards and ensure they stay out of trouble."

Funding for the project, which is backed by North Wales Police and Wrexham Council, comes to an end in March despite the positive feedback the scheme has been receiving. Janet Ryder said: "It's hard to demonstrate that youngsters haven't got involved in anti-social behaviour as a direct result of this team - how do you prove a negative? But I believe it's an effective way to improve our communities and deserves further support."

Tuesday, 13 October 2009

Wrexham tops WAG budget settlement


This went out to the local press in Wrexham:

Wrexham will receive the highest increase in Assembly Government funding for Welsh councils in the latest round of funding announcements.

The 3.1% increase for 2010-11 has been welcomed by Plaid Cymru's North Wales AM Janet Ryder. She said: "Wrexham doesn't qualify for the EU Convergence Fund and has been badly hit by job losses in the past year. Therefore it's good to hear that Welsh Government funding for the council in the coming financial year is the highest in Wales."

She added: "The picture across North Wales is a mixed one - some councils are receiving below the 2.1% average increase while others, like Denbighshire and Wrexham, are above average. Because of UK government cuts in budgets, there's no doubt that many councils will struggle to maintain services.

"What's important to note is that the Welsh Government has seen a less-than-expected block grant from London because of UK government cuts but is ensuring that cuts are minimised for local councils. This is where the frontline services are and these are the services we need to protect and safeguard. That's why the Welsh Government has ensured that councils overall are getting the same funding increase as the Assembly itself."

 Wrexham Council will receive £162 million from the Welsh Government, an increase of £7 million, but the Plaid AM is concerned that the long-term funding settlement for Welsh councils could look bleak. 

Janet Ryder launched a passionate attack on the way funding is allocated to Wales. She said: "The Plaid-Labour government in the Assembly has had to use money held in reserve to help at this vital time. That is because London governments have consistently underfunded Wales because of the flawed Barnett Formula. This formula means that Labour in London is holding back money that should come to Wales. The independent Commission chaired by Gerald Holtham identified this spending gap and said that, until the funding formula was reviewed, no further cuts should be imposed on Welsh funding. This has been ignored and that ultimately means that frontline services such as health, education and social services will feel the pinch.

 "Plaid has campaigned for many years for a fair funding formula to ensure that Wales gets the money it needs. Unless that is addressed, next year's settlement is likely to be followed by more severe cuts."

The full settlement is detailed below:


WELSH LOCAL GOVERNMENT SETTLEMENT 2010-11




















Provisional





















Table 1a: Increase in AEF







?000s













Local Authority

2009-10 
Final AEF?

2010-11 Provisional AEF?

% increase

Rank













ISLE OF ANGLESEY

93,595

94,531

1.00%

21


GWYNEDD

168,441

170,197

1.04%

20


CONWY

144,405

146,042

1.13%

19


DENBIGHSHIRE

134,698

137,920

2.39%

6


FLINTSHIRE

183,618

186,989

1.84%

12


WREXHAM

157,409

162,294

3.10%

1


POWYS

179,219

181,012

1.00%

22


CEREDIGION

98,978

101,042

2.09%

9


PEMBROKESHIRE

159,957

162,181

1.39%

17


CARMARTHENSHIRE

247,315

251,678

1.76%

13


SWANSEA

296,521

302,028

1.86%

11


NEATH PORT TALBOT

195,419

198,861

1.76%

14


BRIDGEND

176,092

180,723

2.63%

4


THE VALE OF GLAMORGAN

148,613

152,161

2.39%

7


RHONDDA CYNON TAFF

340,172

348,653

2.49%

5


MERTHYR TYDFIL

85,654

87,343

1.97%

10


CAERPHILLY

248,483

254,083

2.25%

8


BLAENAU GWENT

107,958

109,593

1.52%

16


TORFAEN

129,087

131,169

1.61%

15


MONMOUTHSHIRE

97,790

98,904

1.14%

18


NEWPORT

191,062

196,974

3.09%

2


CARDIFF

382,753

394,093

2.96%

3













Wales

3,967,239

4,048,471

2.05%















Footnote :1. 2010-11 figures include the transfers in and out of the settlement, 2009-10 figures are therefore adjusted to include the 2009-10 value  to allow comparison at local authority level. This results in a slight difference (0.02%) when compared with the overall  increase in funding before the inclusion of transfers.